Friday, December 16, 2011
The December Flames & Smoky Future
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Right to Information: A Frankenstein's Monster?
1) Take the PSUs out of RTI purview: There are industry level regulators, watchdogs, ombudsmen that can do the job of redressing grievances of customers and other parties. Time and resources in a commercial enterprise are important elements in achieving profitability and competitiveness and we cannot expect PSU employees to spend time attending RTI applications.
2) Dilute the RTI substantially in respect of federal level organizations such as a central ministry. The watered down version of RTI Act should empower only respected media organizations (short listed based on readership/viewership data) to seek access to information under RTI and not any Tom, Dick and Harry. There are wheeler-dealers and agents who are out to destabilize government of the day by dropping in an RTI query.
3) In respect of local and state level bodies, empower all citizens to seek access to information. The citizens should primarily concern themselves with basic public services delivered by such local/regional bodies and therefore rights under RTI should be restricted to such grievances only rather than any fancy debate between two ministries of the central government on any abstract policy matter.
4) Cap the number of applications an applicant can make during one year (proxies may be used to bypass such rule but still there should be some bar on total no. of applications made)
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Ek Lau
Thursday, October 14, 2010
A Pat on the Back
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Mantriji
He is in lift today. Tomorrow, you may well find him climbing up the stairs to reach his third floor office in New Delhi. Is this a coming of age for India? May be. Let's pray, it is indeed..!
Monday, October 4, 2010
ALL IZ WELL ?
2nd October (birth anniversary of the Mahatma) had a calming influence on the anxious city which was god send considering that the following day the much-maligned Games were to be inaugurated with fanfare. The Games, the preparations of which will go down in history as a case study in poor management and misgovernance, have begun finally. It is generally observed and felt that India does well in crisis like situation. The rains vanished in Delhi and things started looking up under the moderate October sun. Hate them or love them, the Games were there to be there at any cost. Management pundits may call this 'effectiveness': getting things done. Do not ask how and at what cost. Do not ask how efficiently the tax payers' monenies were spent. Do not ask how many hours our labourers could sleep in a day. Do not ask how may abuses rolled down the tongues of our embarrased and worried officials and ministers to get the Village cleaned up. The 'effectiveness' means that you were ready on the evening of October 3 to welcome the world and diffuse the feeling amongst the citizens of Delhi that ALL IZ WELL.
I recall having read something about the handling of Mumbai floods being rated higher than the handling of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. We don't have planners in India, we have crisis managers, fire fighters and damage controllers. Smoke does billow out but it's not a conflagration that you run into eventually.
TAILPIECE
Delhi 2010 are supposed to be 'green games'. I do not know how and why. An event of this scale is bound to guzzle much more fuel and energy than activities of the normal times, no matter how nicely you dress up your city with jute sculptures. Being green can't be just a fad or PR statement.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Delhi's very own "1984"
Next time, you want to have Games in any city of India, please conduct referendum on the issue. So, we don't start barking up the tree which turns out to be a wrong one. The Games is anti-Aam Adami except, of course, some 'New Deal' effect on employment generated by building stadia and demolishing and rebuilding roads, bridges and pavements.
Saturday, September 4, 2010
New Delhi Times
Still, we will pull it off. But there will be lessons to learn and remember forever.
#The only positive news today in Delhi is Metro. This world class MRTS has done us proud and empowered a common citizen. And surely, Metro did not have leadership vacuum. But sadly, Metro's success is an exception in the city's governance and not a rule: A lone peak in the otherwise flat, stagnant and at times even sliding performance of public systems of Delhi.
Friday, June 25, 2010
The Crusader Lokayukta
Justice Santosh Hegde's decision to quit as Lokayukta is a grim reminder of the state of the affairs in our governments. The BJP government in Karnataka is justifiably facing heat from all quarters of the civil society. But we cannot put only Karnataka government in dock. In other states either the administration is 'clean' or the Lokayukta is not interested in taking his job seriously. The probability of the former proposition being true is 'very low' given India's records in corruption and malpractice. So, it could well be a fact that Lokayuktas are not living upto the expectations of their role as corruption watchdogs in other states. Hence the calm in the corridors of power and feeling of 'all is well' amongst the citizens. Karnataka, I suspect, is not an exception. Justice Hegde chose to spill the beans and we have an 'exposed' BJP government groping for excuses and explanations.
In the meantime, the public can raise a toast to Justice Hegde because his counterparts in other states may well be the people who have simply esconced themselves in this post retirement, super-bureaucratic sort of assignment which nobody (even the media) takes seriously.
Tailpiece:
Like Kafkaesque bureaucracy in other areas of governance, 'grievance redressal' in India is also a bureaucratic jumble of government agencies. The common man is confused as to who will redress their grievance about so many agencies with fancy names: District Magistrate, Panchayats, Ministers, CBI, Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, RTI commissioner, Director of Public Grievances, Ombudsman, Lok Pal, Lokayukta, Vigilance commissioners......(I'm sure the list is long and I have missed out many 'important' grievance redressal agencies of our country)
Monday, June 7, 2010
Travesty of Justice: The Tragedy deepens
The story does not end here. See how our obsession with free pricing can play havoc with the letter and spirit of Public Liability Insurance Act. Industries get huge discounts nowadays- there is a price war in the market- in the mandatory Public Liability Act insurance policies as if we are living in a safe world and Bhopal like disaster is a nightmare which is never to be re-enacted again in real life. A part of the premium goes into a Fund set up under Public Liability Insurance Act. Heavy discounts in premium result into poor accretion to this vital relief fund which can come in handy in fighting at least the financial consequences of such environmental accidents.
A gas leak from a pesticide plant has consequences that span generations of human beings. The archaic framework for legal compensation has compounded the problems of our slothful and pliable investigation machinery and there is nobody around (the so called three pillars of our constitution –executive, legislature and judiciary have miserably failed in helping the victims) who can lessen the pain of those who have suffered the consequence of Dec 2-3, 1984.
The verdict has been delivered. We have debated it and lamented the travesty of justice. Life will go on. A new day will break and some government inspector will land in a factory only to be bribed away by the owner. Bhopals are waiting to happen in this country.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Tragedy of Errors?
(1) The incumbent political party at both Centre and State has been voted back to power (Wasn't 26/11 serious enough to be an important poll issue?)
(2) It's not very clear what the government is doing about doing up the intelligence apparatus and fixing the fabled 'inter-agency co-ordination' problem. A new bureaucratic body called NIA has been created which would take time in finding its feet. What about reforms in the existing institutions?
(3) We did not stand our political class when 26/11 happened. If one looks back at the events that happened during last 12 months, our mistrust of our political class has only trebled. (Koda scam, Maharashtra assembly oath-taking ceremony, Shiv Sena's nativism and violence, Spectrum allocation scam, Manu Sharma's parole......). Are our ministers capable of organizing an efficient and motivated security apparatus? Can they lead by example?
(4) America still helps Pakistan no matter how hard President Obama would try to placate and pacify Indian government. We cling on to the N-deal and avoid 'straight talking' with the US while our neighbour continues to plot new designs of bleeding us, motivated by the stupendous success of 26/11.
(5) We do not know if we would be able to thwart another 26/11 in future. This is where lies the singular failure of our governments. Whatever they're doing and are seen to be doing fails woefully to reassure us, the Aam Adami (common citizen) of India.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Mandate for a Strong PM
I would like to reproduce the following words of my blog dated 5 July, 2008:
It is heartening to see our government hanging on to the US nuclear deal. It is not very common to see national governments finding a mission and leaving no stone unturned to achieve it. These are the qualities we usually identify with private sector. Isn't it an example of management by objectives?
Yes, Manmohan Singh's UPA government saw the deal through in a manner one usually associates with the fabled efficient functioning of private sector. I know N-deal is too intellectually hefty an issue to influence results of a General Election in a country like India. But N-deal certainly stands as a metaphor of efficiency, integrity and purposefulness of the UPA government which came to power in 2004. The mandate won today by the Congress led political formation brings the issue of 'performance' to the fore.
Sonia Gandhi did a brilliant job of putting together a team of extra-ordinary gentlemen tasked with executing the liberal socialist political programme laid down in NCMP. Dr Manmohan Singh's role was largely technocratic. May be he was not a heavy-weight political leader but he handled the implementation of the UPA agenda well and at times saw through the difficult decisions in the teeth of fierce opposition. And average Indian anyway hates politics. So we did not mind having a political lightweight but an intelligent, knowledgeable and honest economist as our PM. Also, Sonia Gandhi was never seen throwing her weight around. The Gandhi family, on the whole, has astutely supported the PM during the five year term. This may be the reason the UPA is being voted back to power despite several shortcomings of the previous UPA government. With much political experience gained during the first term of UPA government, we can look forward to seeing a more confident and resurgent Dr Manmohan Singh in the next five years! As someone who lies behind the victory of 2009, as someone who does not just understand economics but also the business of governance.
The Verdict of 2009 should be remembered as a victory of the leadership model Sonia Gandhi has experimented, as a personal victory of a good politician and human being who is not a rabble rouser but an honest and clear- headed leader. He is not and has never been a weak Prime Minister...!!
Friday, March 6, 2009
REALITY CHECK
Though the high flying India which ruled the world for the first eight years of this decade was not a flash in the pan, the so called success story had been stretched too far by the cheerleaders. The story fled the realm of reality. It crocked and floundered only to seek refuge in the dazzling and magical world of fiction. Who would not remember the days when the financial papers would headline, in mega bold fonts, the rise and rise of the fabled Sensex? As if there is no life beyond Sensex. And a five figure Sensex meant India's nirvana, a panacea of the all the problems the Indians faced. We were living in a world of inflated expectations and oversimplified postulates. We had started judging ourselves by the yardstick of the salaries IIMA or B graduates would be offered in campus placements. By the unprecedented revenue figures our finance ministers projected in every Budget. By the ultra mega projects the Cabinets or the 'empowered groups' of our arthritis-ridden, hypertensive or diabetic ministers would clear with an unfailing regularity and unflagging pomp. But, for a man on the street, has India really changed? Are we really not a Third World country any more?
Here is the reality check!
1) Governance (Satyam): The fraud revealed once again the gap between 'prescription' and 'description' which is one of main defining characteristics of a developing society. A maze of laws and regulations overseen by an equally complex maze of 'ministries/departments' and 'regulators' is no deterrent at all. One can coolly bypass them and make the agencies look like buffoons.
2) Quality of Life: Just hit a road every evening in a city like Mumbai. There are highways, expressways, sea links and flyovers in the city but streets in a suburb leading to or fanning out of a station make mockery of our tall claims about improvement in infrastructure. You will be enveloped by clouds of smoke and the noise of lound restless honks of the vehicles trapped in traffic hold ups. It's a mayhem one comes across as one steps out of his or her home or office. People are seen standing crammed in crowded buses (which appear not be advancing even an inch) and sitting huddled in rickety auto-rickshaws, groping for a semblance of life which their political leaders promise them every election year. They have a capsulated existence which starts everyday with newspapers and end with saas-bahu serials with a few songs on FM radio or MP3, a couple of hurried meals, a few hours of half baked discussions on cricket, stock market and politics and a few tiffs with bosses and colleagues and neighbours and fellow commuters stuffed in between.
Life on streets is a potentially carcinogenic, high decibel chaos.
3) India is still known for corruption and bureaucratic red tape. The bright and incorruptible social activists manage to influence policies (UPA deserves some credit for this) but we are yet to see them taking the helm at our ministries. The sane, sensible and liberal voice still remains at the margins.
4) Farmers commit suicides in this country. Skilled workers of diamond industry are slogging under the scorching sun on road construction sites. We do not have a policy and action plan in place to address the social security issues of the informal and unorganized sectors of our economy. We are more concerned about pink slips that dread our BPO and IT workers who throng swanky office buildings in Pune, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Gurgaon or Noida everyday.
5) Internal Security: There isn't any area which has been more mismanaged than this since our independence. There is no federal level, pan India strategy or will to combat this menace. The debate still remains lost in 'State List' and 'Union List' inspite of 26/11. A homeland is a homeland. Chandigarh is no different from Chhatisgarh when it comes to dealing with national security.
Can we still say we have left our THIRD WORLD status far behind? There is a long way to go. Is it not?
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Save SOUTH ASIA
Leave alone a Pakistani, even an Indian may not like this. But one can help drawing this sad and worrying conclusion: Pakistan is in ruins. Before it drags down south Asia, the world has to act. The western powers like US will have to repair the wrongs done.
Just try to deconstruct the whole damn thing called terrorism. There are terrorists who are enemies of civil societies and governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan and neither of the two wants them. Another bunch has these guys who are zealously supported and trained by the Pakistan government to bleed countries like India. And this tribe of terrorists is very much in demand by the Pakistan government and the so called other state and non-state actors in tow. And somewhere in between lies the twilight zone of the ruthless terror machine. Pakistan is the victim as well as the perpetrator. But its fate as a victim does not outweigh its self-appointed role of perpetrator, the one that does not hesitate in using terrorism as an instrument of state policy.
‘What would happen if you try to ride a tiger…?’, says P Chidambaram, India’s Home Minister, very rightly.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
The Heroes of Bombay
But 26/11 did not strike Bombay. It assaulted Mumbai. Bombay had long ceased to exist.
The things had already begun to turn sour a few years ago. The city of Bombay lost its identity and this vibrant and free space of human ingenuity and creativity was soon hijacked by irrational and cynical politics. Cosmopolitanism came to be eclipsed by chauvinism. Bombay became Mumbai. And VT became CST. The city did grow physically, adding flyovers, expressways and sea links, but the soul and the spirit remained muffled. As Shashi Tharoor writes somewhere- a story of Bombay is the story of decline. But this was not enough.
When Kasab and his team swooped down on Mumbai on that fateful day, they did not have an inkling that the city would turn out to be such a sitting duck. The city was already battle weary. It proved to be perhaps the easiest prey of the jihadi gunmen.
The city with its hollow core and rusted frame did fight back. It took the entire might of the Indian state to neutralize the terrorists in a long drawn operation. Before India came to rescue, the Bombay had to hold them off. And what the whole world witnessed during those 60 hours were the tales of extraordinary courage and heroism of the ordinary folks and the cops: Call them Mumbaikars or Bombayites. People fought and went down on the streets which until a few moments ago were looking so safe, familiar and bustling. 26/11 is as much a story of terrorism as extraordinary heroism. 26/11 threw up city’s own heroes, those who now can be our new icons and can be remembered in our campaign to reinvigorate the decaying dream of India. Wasn’t it reassuring to learn that heroes are found not only on the rarefied heights of Kargil mountains or jungles of the Naxalite strongholds but also in the ‘comfort zones’ of the new urban India priding itself on IT, BPO and a double digit growth rate?
The dawn of 27/11 restored some semblance of the lost Bombay. The fight was on. The fight is still on.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
INDIA: Bruised & Wounded
The current India-Pakistan stand-off is being viewed through the prism of war. But as India has made it abundantly clear, war is not the solution to the problem. India wants to bring the perpetrators of the Mumbai 26/11 carnage to justice and seeks Pakistan's co-operation in this regard. This is, in my opinion, still a soft stance on the issue of India's victimhood of cross border terrorism. Why should India consider the terrorist strikes only a handiwork of a bunch of LeT masterminds? If one can ever distinguish between the acts of state and non-state actors, the onus of proof as to state actors' innocence in this episode should rest with Pakistan government. The scale and intensity of the attacks leaves barely anything to imagination. How can such a ruthlessly and accurately planned massacre be executed without state support? India is talking tough. But tough talk or plainspeak would lead us nowhere. The need of the hour is a concrete action which can be regarded as a deterrent to any future adventurism staged against India from Pakistani soil. Even Pakistan's handing over of the terrorists accused in 26/11 would not solve this conundrum. The menace of terrorism is very political in nature and 26/11 is just another sophisticated and brutal version of manifestation of the historical animosity of the two South Asian neighbours.
The Road Ahead:
1. Capitalize on India's clean record in complying with security related international conventions/laws/treaties/regimes
2. Put a stress on the right of self-defence to justify any war-like action/hot pursuit of the terrorists
3. Communicate to the international community that carnages like 26/11 has nothing to do with the Kashmir issue. Publicize India's victimhood widely and use this to get away with a bit of roguishness. Tell the world you are tired of being a nice guy. That the world has paid a lip service to India's cause. That Pakistan is at war with you and you need to act now.
4. Responsibility for terror acts lie not only with a few rogue elements of militant groups in Pakistan but also with the Pakistani establishment that support these operatives or turn a Nelson's eyes to their activities, to say the least.
5. Chalk out a schedule of actions and strategies with clear timelines. Show it to the world powers and the UN. And go ahead. Ignore the noises and murmurs of those who advise restraint. Tell them to assure safety and protection of your citizens or just shut up. India cannot wait indefinitely for the world powers to discipline Pakistan.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
A Wednesday
A month has passed since Mumbai faced one of the most devastating terrorist strikes on 26 November, 2008, the date which has gone down in the annals of history as 26/11. The memory has not yet faded. The feelings of trauma, shock and anguish are still green in our hearts and minds. The event is sinking in the collective psyche of our nation. We do not want to forget it. The gun battles played out at some of the icons of the city of Mumbai reminded us of what it means to be a nation under siege.
There are people out there, across the borders, who are hell bent on harming India, bleeding civil society of India. The birth and rise of the Indian nation has not gone down well with these people. Call them anything: state actors or non-state actors. They have a single point agenda. They are terrorists.
You are not a hawk, you are not a maverick, if you are advocating to have them stamped out. You are just a sensible and sensitive human being, who is sincere about saving the humanity from the scourge of terrorism.
Now we get down to pick up the pieces and try to make some sense of how this might have happened notwithstanding our mighty and many-splendoured state security apparatus: the IB, RAW, the Police, the Army, the Navy, the Cost Guard and last but not the least our ever articulate and preachy political leaders occupying the top rungs of governments. One certainly should not tarnish the administrative agencies and the political executive with the same brush. But it is hard to look at the accountability issue in a fragmented manner. For us, the citizens of India, the Indian state (comprising both administrative and political ruling class) has failed miserably to secure safety for us and it definitely was found wanting when a few jihadi youths ran amok on the night of 26/11 and took the southern and the most iconic part of India's commerical hub by a ghastly surprise. The most tragic revelation of this episode is how we have not learnt the lessons and were caught off guard again in spite of being a victim of terrorist acts since so many years. Terrorism is not alien to us.
That said, we must recognize that the challenges to internal security are also formidable. After all, India has banned at least 34 organizations/groups and we can say at any given time India is at war with 34 internal enemies, not to mention Pakistan and other sovereign state actors and non-state actors (if one can ever distinguish between the two) active in our neighbourhoods.
This question sends chill down our spine. But we now cannot avoid posing it.
ARE WE PREPARED? CAN WE EVER SAY THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM IS WON?
Friday, November 14, 2008
Celebrating Change
The beginning is somewhat flashy and swashbuckling. But one thing is clear: the Obama-Biden administration means business. There is so much to do and there is no time to lose. A four year term is woefully inadequate to usher in the change Obama stands for and envisages. We can expect the new administration to be packed with change agents and innovators. One hopes the President-elect knows that innovation, if not guided properly, can also wreak havoc with one's plans. You cannot set out to renovate everything around you. Nor is the Presidency a hollywood blockbuster, full of twists, thrills and breathtaking experiments. But it is too naive to tell this to Mr Obama. He has dreamt this dream for many years and he surely knows the best how to put the dream into action and make the world a little bit better than what it is today.
The victory of Barack Obama has overwhelmed the world. Even the frigid Europe (the so called 'old Europe', the continent) has warmed up to the news of his victory. We better refrain from analysing him now. We better refrain from questioning him now. Let him just perform. It may be a great delight to see him perform and deliver. In his success lies the success of everything a liberal global society has alwasys stood for and yearned for.
Let us not be skeptical of this great American moment.
Best wishes, Mr Obama...
Friday, October 17, 2008
Fall from Grace: End of Capitalism?
The lessons are clear: Shun greed. Keep the markets well-regulated. Employ the smartest and sharpest guys as regulators. Don't write off governments and public ownership. It is the State which is bailing you out now. Punish those severely who play around with people’s money and undertake risky adventures and innovative financial engineering (experts call it ‘structured finance’). The USD 700 billion bail out plan appears to make capitalism a sham. Isn’t it a gargantuan waste of public resources? Far from being an efficient system, the casino capitalism has eaten away at GDP of several nations overnight.
And how about remembering Nehru for a few moments? Isn’t his mixed economy model for India a classic and prophetic answer to the crazy extremes of capitalism and socialism? Remember him, when you get over the anxieties about security of your stocks, ULIPs, SIPs and bank FDs.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Capital (ism) Punishment
The financial market meltdown in the US has shaken the world. The big names of the Wall Street are licking the dust. It all started with the subprime crisis and now the problem appears to have reached its nadir with the collapse of firms like Lehman Brothers. The globalization of financial capitalism and interconnectedness of financial markets mean that the crisis will cast its spell well beyond the boundaries of the United States. A lot of questions hover over our heads. How can everything go so wrong? Is the world of finance so complex and beyond the reach of regulators and governments? It is not rocket science, isn't it? Let us try to decipher how this earthquake happened.
Yes. The world of finance is indeed a complex one. The most worrying aspect is the amenability of financial products to a bewildering possibilities of engineering and re-engineering. An underlying asset may not be a prime one. Or it may be a junk bond which your regulator may now allow you to dabble in. But what if you bundle the prime loans with sub-prime loans and try to offload them to some other lender? This lender might be completely oblivious to the default risk lurking around every such exotic structured product. Worse still, this lender may find some aggressive and smart chaps who provide funds to facilitate such transactions also. After all, your Central Bank has slashed interest rates to help you guys prop up the sagging economy and credit has got cheaper. And who does not want to earn 'risk premium'? You are not here in this world of high finance to dabble in T bills only. You may not like to imagine that real estate boom is not going to be there always. You continue to innovate and repackage securities and loans. You take other decent guys also on board who are sick of doing the mundane job of taking deposits and lending money. Don't banks find their task a 'no brainer'? Why shouldn't they also fuel the creativity triggered by the mortgage market? And who is watching? Most of these innovations are off balance sheet transactions. The Central Banks and governments (if these two entities are indeed considered independent and separate !) are busy reversing the slowdown and burning midnight oil to inject liquidity in the system. And the regulators are still learning the ropes. Let the party go on until, of course, you find yourself at the end of your rope.
The thriller does not end here. Banks are smart enough to insure their exposures with the likes of AIG. You go under. You drag down the system with you. And you look to the governments to pay for the follies which, but for this crisis, would have passed off as creativity and ingenuity. The game starts with a small time home loan borrower who may miss his repayment but stops when the giant insurer finds itself gasping for breath. And you have a government who willy nilly extends an olive branch called a bridge loan worth USD 85 billions to AIG. But the same government, weary of bailing out failed 'innovators' and 'alchemists', turns away, somewhat enigmatically, when it comes to salvaging Lehman Brothers.
AIG has been nationalized. Now we know nationalization is not something which can happen in India only. The state is not in retreat. Governments are still relevant to our lives.
So, that is how the Wall Street has been disgraced. Capitalism does not look confident. Thus, the world of complex high finance, though resting on the foundation of something as predictable and straightforward as mathematics, is still fraught with grave dangers. And here, human inventiveness is the main culprit besides greed and ever expanding desire for netting arbitrage.
Will we learn lessons from this debacle?